Craptastic

about
articles
news
search
videos
home

Photorific

Login
Register«

Cooliferous

images (NSFW)
searches
taa
buy stuff
Last.fm
Facebook
» bug reports

News Talk

2009... th~
Randomness~
Fantastic ~
A white ch~
Seven Poun~

Article Talk

Casey's of~
Part 25: I~
Part 24: D~
Part 23: D~
Now What D~

New Articles

Resolution~
Part 25: I~
Part 24: D~
Part 23: D~
Part 22: A~

News

2009... th~
Seven Poun~
Fantastic ~
A white ch~
Sometimes ~

Forum ad dicundum Conoris: Vol 4

By: Conor
on Friday, May 7th 2004 at 11:28pm

Okay...here are some 'social/environmental' issues/questions that I want to raise. Granted they're all largely local/regional/national issues, but they are all things that have relevance for the world at large.

Gas prices. In Vancouver and St. John's it is just under $1.00/L and here we're pushing $.90. My view? Keep it going up. In fact, the price should keep rising til it hits $2.00. Why you ask? Is it to make the rich oil tycoons richer no? Seeing as I'm not part of that wealth, no. No, my reasons are environmental. Yes, Canada has been exhibiting a skyrocketing increase in the number of folks with Ashtma. The reason? Pollution. So, if you increase the price of gas to ridiculous levels then you will eventually get people off the road. Moreover, they will be forced to live closer to their place of employment and even, heaven forbid, take public transit. Don't get me wrong. I'm just as guilty now or at least this past year - but...it eats away at me every day and NEVER AGAIN will I be part of this GREAT EVIL of western civilization. It needs to be fixed, no question.

This leads me to my second topic of discussion, that most glorious anomalies, the 'suburb'. Probably one of the 5 worst things to happen to humanity, suburbs are something that need to be eliminated. The whole breakfast community concept with wide roads and box stores and so forth is immensely flawed. And...it leads me to the next topic of discussion.

There is a large outcry in my neighbourhood to prevent the construction of some condos on a wee piece of woodland in the Dufferin area. For those who don't live here here's the situation. There's a wee wooded area in my neighbourhood, which by Canadian standards is an old one and rather lovely too, behind some apartments. You see, as one heads southwest from my area you near the Grand river and the land dips - i.e., it get's lower and the woodland is in a wee ravine, though surrounded by housing. So, here's my thoughts. First of all, knocking down the trees is bad, don't get me wrong. Moreover, there certainly seems to be a plethora of available and in my eyes more desirable land right on the Grand River and so why they want this spot is beyond me. However, with that said, here's my problem with the naysayers. First of all, this reeks too much of a bunch of rich people feeling the need to give themselves a pat on the shoulder my having their own environmental moment. While not everyone who lives here is rich per say, that term is comparatively appropriate for a significant number of the houses in this neighbourhood. So, in those cases it seems like a whole lot of bullshit. You know, what Ontario needs is more affordable housing. In a country where 1 in 6 childern live in a poverty, is it so wrong to build housing units that are more affordable to those families that fall within that income bracket? Call me crazy, but POVERTY IS STILL A BAD THING. So, if these are rental units that they are building all the better. I believe that there is no place for elitism in this world. Now, let's discuss the environmental impact. I have no problem with folks concerned about the possible environmental problems that it would cause, but I don't see anyone complaining about the mass destruction of woodland and farmaland in the north of Brantford, the west of brantford, or the east part of brantford, have you? So why the fuck is this neighbourhood any more important? If you're gonna complain about this, then you better damn well do something about the important problem of loss of land in the surrounding area of Brantford. Plus, is it SO WRONG to try and increase the number of people who live in the city centre? God knows we have a downtown with loads of potential and so we really should be trying to bring in as many people into the city centre as possible. And that, yes that folks is why I'm not against the cutting down of the wee woodland. I'm not necessarily all for it either, but I think that my concerns are important ones that really are not being considered by either side. The new unit folks are in it for the buck. But I'm not so sure that many of the salvage folks are that much better.

Finally, let's talk healthcare. It's time for privatization. There's really nothing more to say. At least there shouldn't be. But, again, that scorn of humanity, 'ignorance', tends to crop its ugly head up whenever this is an issue, which it should be. The problem is that a lot of folks here the words 'privatize Canadian healthcare' and they immediately freak, and fear that this means a two-tier system and the rich blah blah blah. Ignoring the fact that this country has a thing against those who succeed, I can say that two tier does not equal loss in quality in the public part. YOU CAN HAVE A PUBLIC/PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM WHERE EVERYONE WINS. They have it in Britain and their system isn't crumbling. As long as the doctors all must work in both parts of the system, then there is NO PROBLEM. No one loses access to healthcare and in fact everyone would benefit. It can work and if we implement it it will work. In fact, we need it...make no bones about it. Our system is overrun with shortages and delays and something should have been done a long time ago.

Finally, there's always time for Iraq. This idiotic war, which is partly for oil - if you know you're history than you will see that this has been a prominent part of western interaction in the middle east for at least a 100 years. Of course, it's also about finishing up what one's father started. But...anyway, Rumsfeld has to go. There's no excuse for what happened. The Americans are not above the law. And ignoring the fact the US government has completely fucked up what was a HORRIBLE IDEA in the first place, one of the saddest parts is how the situation reflects on Americans in general. Most of the soldiers over there are upstanding citizens who are there for the noble cause of fighting for freedom and their country. In my eyes, there's nothing wrong with that. But, as a result of the greed and near-sightedness of the republican government, the US and its citizens are in more danger than they ever were before the decision was made to invade. So the victims that matter (I don't give a shit about the 'dubya' government) are the Iraqi citizens, police officers, the 'good' US and coalition soldiers, and the western world in general.

And now I'm done.

Other Articles

Next: Funk from Conor
Next: No clue what I'm writing about, but hey! from viv
Previous: Untitled Title that is Untitled from Conor

Comments for Forum ad dicundum Conoris: Vol 4

prev . 1 . next
4 Comments

SmrtySsa Wrote...

Saturday, May 8th 2004 at 12:18am

Wow, you seem a bit... angry.

Anyways, I'm only going to comment on the development plan for the dufferen/springstreet pit.

But, it won't be affordable housing. The idea of a 'Condo' is something people own rather than rent, and what will probably start around $150,000 per unit - that's not considered "affordable"

I'm for it mainly because it sounds nice, and the plans look nice and would in fact put some spring into spring street. (kinda like spreading the value from dufferin down the hill.. yo.)

I don't like the idea of wiping out a small forest... especially of old growth like that area, but we can plant more trees...

especially on front lawns, etc. if every house in this city planted a tree on their front lawn (those who don't have one) I think it'd look a lot nicer. Probably smell better too.

It just sounds to me a lot like the whole harding carpets things where people around here were pissed when the city sold it for $100,000 to some "unknown" developer. I was quite happy, and I'm quite happy to sleep to the large machinery rebuilding the place over there now.

Allinson Wrote...

Saturday, May 8th 2004 at 10:55am

Hi there:
When I left Britain in the 60's a gallon of gas was the equivalent of about $2 there compared to 35c here. Today, the gas price in England exceeds $5/gallon to ours now closing in on $3 a gallon -- and there is no end to the number of new cars, albeit with lower emissions, entering the market every year: message - gas prices do not control new car registrations. Fuel cells and new technology is the answer - California has emission control legislation in the works that will mandate 'green cars' by 2010.

Agree on repatriating downtown in favor of urban sprawl, and raised my kids in the area between Eglinton and Lawrence just West of Yonge. My first house was in a new development in Oshawa (near the lake) and hated sub-division living -- was in the car, commuting, at least 2 hours/day. Gentrification of downtown areas attempts to displace the indigent, a permanent fixture now in most city centers, hence its easier to take flight to sub divisions, and 'gated communities' in the US. Conversion of wooded areas to sub divisions is simply criminal, but that's how Lastman in North York and Kallion in Mississauga became the czars of the bedroom communities serving Toronto. Developers have to make a living too and their connections to politicians 'in power' at city halls makes 'wee' areas of woodland prime for development - in the 'public interest' of course as "development" leads to a larger tax base and all the good things that get shoveled down to communities based on resident head count: Schools, Hospitals, highway/water/sewer development, etc.

On Healthcare privatization - again the 'developers' are in the hunt to follow the US model of healthcare for profit! Lived in New Jersey for two years and had an excellent health care plan that paid for 80% of a 30 page list of procedures and services (the not-covered list was more general, providing a plethora of loopholes for insurance lawyers to exploit). Also, the list was so comprehensive that I could only get service at 40 or so local clinics/hospitals - and I traveled out of state 2 of every 4 weeks (and held my breath, hoping not to need out of state services). The US health care insurance companies and service providers are focused on the retirement of individuals so that they can be dumped on social security and off their liability lists - just when you start to really need healthcare services, the rug is pulled! Don't be fooled, there is little compassion in a pay for service healthcare system.

On Iraq and Rumsfeld - you don't hold the mayor or police chief personally responsible for street crime and homicides - they are, ultimately, responsible to put controls in place to stop street crime and homicides? How can the Secretary of Defense in the US or even here in Canada (remember Somalia where the result was that a complete Canadian division was dishonored and disbanded?) be held responsible for individuals acting like animals - prior to discovery. Getting rid of Rumsfeld is the wrong fight - eliminating the influence of the Hawks: NRA, AEI, Cato and Hudson Institutes might be the right fight!

SmrtySsa Wrote...

Sunday, May 9th 2004 at 3:42am

really, the only thing high gas prices will do is effect leisure ("spare money spending") industries... because people will have less spare money.

people who drive to work will continue to do so until gas prices consume their entire paycheque. at which point working is futile. but until then, they've still got bills to pay.

Allinson Wrote...

Sunday, May 9th 2004 at 10:00am

Interesting notion on fossil fuels: "Human beings like to believe they are in control of their destiny, but when the history of life on Earth is seen in perspective, the evolution of Homo sapiens is merely a transient episode that acts to redress the planet's energy balance. David Price" - DIE OFF - a population crash resource page

prev . 1 . next
4 Comments

You must be Logged in to leave comments.