Craptastic

about
articles
news
search
videos
home

Photorific

Login
Register«

Cooliferous

images (NSFW)
acronyms
buy stuff
Facebook
Twitter

News Talk

pole posit~
Walkin' He~
That Smell
Canada Pos~
Speechless~

Article Talk

Sucks Ass:~
Too Happy ~
Omega Inte~
This is Me~
Atheist Ir~

New Articles

Too Happy ~
Volantynys
Damaged = ~
Atheist Ir~
Book Revie~

News

pole posit~
PPL Park
Walkin' He~
Social Add~
Sleepless-~

Why IE? Why?

By: SmrtySsa
on Thursday, July 8th 2004 at 9:04am

There's been a recent outcry, or wailing about Internet Explorer... You know, the browser that you're probably using... and the one that I've always said sucks? I've had many a chuckle about the bugs that have recently come forth from it and I can't help but to wonder why people use it. Then I realize people hate change, and people hate to learn something new. It's in peoples mindset to click the big lowercase 'e' and go surfing!

I often end up installing Mozilla (for the sake of email and web) on client systems and say "here, use this" Sometimes it's easy for them to just click and go. But for people who have used the internet for a long time, it's hard to switch from the e(vil).

Just for informational purposes I'll explain to you this 'recent' bug.

This bug allows a bad person to put on someones website a virus-type program and disguise it as an image file that your browser will download. The browser will fetch the image, try to display it and say "Shit, this isn't a real image." By then, poor error handling on Microsofts part has allowed this mal-program to run on your system and do whatever it needed to do. You didn't have to click a thing.

This little bug will also exploit Microsofts very own web server (IIS 5.0). Infected systems will look for sites using Microsoft servers and infect them, if they can and cause visitors to that site to experience the same infection. Again, no user intervention is required.

This is only one of a few bugs that can have this affect. There have been in the past, and most likely many more in the future, instances where a rogue site can get around "Security" settings set forth in Internet Exploiter. Never before has that name really been completely accurate.

 

What alternatives are there?

There's a few actually. There's Netscape, which is poorly maintained and corporatized by AOL. There's Mozilla Suite -- which is full blown and contains email, web browser, chat and an html editor. There's Mozilla FireFox (just the browser) which is extremely fast and highly configurable via a clean, and so far, secure plugin/extension system. There's Opera - it's adware - but still fairly clean and fast. There are many others too, but not usually Windows based. For linux I have Konqueror, Epiphany and lynx ;)

 

"This Site doesn't work!"

That's the common thing I hear with people who use alternative browsers. Why though? If a site uses ActiveX (this is the develpment tool and interface which allows for windows programs to run inside Internet Explorer. Corporates often swear by even though it's the root of most of IE's problems) -- it can only be viewed with Internet Explorer. It's impossible to fix that -- with alternative browsers comes a need for alternative development. Mozilla, Sun, and a few other companies are currently working on an Open, secure standard to have the same -- but secure -- functionality of ActiveX. Time will fix that.

If a site uses Java, JavaScript or Flash -- it'll work no problem

intel

What about display? If a site doesn't display properly - visually - it's usually because the developer of the site is lazy. You can always complain to them about their site in a kind, tactful way.

If a site uses standards it'll work no problem -- infact, usually better than in IE. This site is a fine example of just that.

 

The Choice is Yours

In a world where things are free to view by whomever has an internet connection -- it should be free to view with whatever, safe, browser they choose. You can of course continue to use IE -- it's your choice. You have now been warned though.

Other Articles

Next: Bell Needs an Enima from SmrtySsa
Next: FCKM - FM from Anesthetic
Previous: Thornley, They're not a Big Wreck from SmrtySsa
Previous: Don't read this--it's depressing from Asrai

Comments for Why IE? Why?

prev . 1 2 . next
11 Comments

Allinson Wrote...

Thursday, July 8th 2004 at 11:08am

Hi there - help out a simple user please: Have a google toolbar (kills pop-ups cold - 700+ in the last three months) Google Toolbar Norton 2002, Firewall, ad blocker and virus software (updated regularly) Spybot: The home of Spybot-S&D! Stops tracking software,
especially MSN's "Avenue A, Inc." A tracking software that downloads every
time you log on to any MSN page! Ad-Aware: Ad-Aware SE Personal - Software - Lavasoft Stops Ads

And, a squared 2: Runtime Error Stops Trojans

Also have the latest MSN updates on this Win 98, P11 266Mhz laptop.

Don't really want to change from Explorer - any suggestions?

SmrtySsa Wrote...

Thursday, July 8th 2004 at 7:13pm

*Shrug*



There's a google toolbar for Firefox

http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?application=firefox&id=33&vid=34



You'll find that if you switch you'll have a lot less recurring hits for your anti-spy/adware software.



Don't need a popup killer because it's already included in the software. Javascript is safer (in both email and web) because you can configure elements (such as window creation, moving, status bar updates, etc.)



I must say though, I have started to see occurances of Mal-(Mozilla/netscape/Firefox) installers on rogue sites (crack/porn/warez, etc sites) - but unlike IE they require a user to hit "OK! Install!" and rely on ignorance rather than a big-ass-bug.

SmrtySsa Wrote...

Thursday, July 8th 2004 at 7:21pm

and actually, as a side - if quick searching is all you need google toolbar for both mozilla browsers have one built in that'll use google, no extension required

Firefox (and mozilla) also have the ability to assign keywords and parameters to bookmarks...

example: I have a bookmark for google.com - it's keyword is google and it accepts parameters.

I goto my address bar (alt-d or ctrl-l) and type 'google pile of crap' - it goes to google and searches for 'pile of crap'

there's another one for dict.org - i type 'dict <word>' and it redirects and searches for <word> .. fast and handy.

I'm very keyboard centric when it comes to this stuff, so... speed!

Allinson Wrote...

Friday, July 9th 2004 at 9:05am

SmrtySsa - over my head, sadly. Thanks regardless.

Beemer Wrote...

Saturday, July 10th 2004 at 3:17am

D-Diddy, is it just me, or does everyone have problems with images on the site? whenever someone posts one, its always...not where it should be. anything i can do to fix that shit?

SmrtySsa Wrote...

Saturday, July 10th 2004 at 7:45am

.. funny you should mention that. It's IE. the code for thumbnails is standardized but the dropshadow ends up above the image with IE and the actual image looks like its hanging out the bottom of the box, right? (or something like that) - also large images that are too big for the main body, IE makes vanish rather than cut off (or have other stuff overlap - as it should because that's what the standards call for ;)

mike Wrote...

Tuesday, July 13th 2004 at 12:07pm

I think it's funny you wrote this article... but there was an article on Slashdot about how an MSN website was touting Firefox as a better alternative to IE the other day... I'll see if I can dig it up

mike Wrote...

Tuesday, July 13th 2004 at 12:08pm

SmrtySsa Wrote...

Tuesday, July 13th 2004 at 10:00pm

hehe.. that article is kinda funny.

on that note too, there's been another FOUR security related bugs found in IE -- it's open season I guess. Not to mention the previous one(s) haven't even been fully fixed...

SmrtySsa Wrote...

Thursday, July 15th 2004 at 10:46am

prev . 1 2 . next
11 Comments

You must be Logged in to leave comments.