Rogers' fancy new notification system: a nasty breach of pri
Posted by: SmrtySsa in Soft 'n Hardware
Monday, April 7th 2008 at 12:30am
Rogers' new notification system for users who have exceeded their "limit" of bandwidth is a gigantic breach of privacy.
When you reach 75% of your limit Rogers network will intercept your requests to view web pages and redirect that request to their own server. This server then returns a small HTML page with some JavaScript functionality to warn you of your impending doom.
The problem with this is fairly straight forward; their server is now playing the role of what's referred to as a man-in-the-middle. Their server is now capable of reading, storing, and even modifying your web pages.
Of course, they'll say they won't and don't - but when you pull something this sleazy, who's going to believe you?
An example of this scenario:
I go to google.ca to search for something.
I'm already logged into google services, as I usually am.
My browser assumes that I'm actually visting google.ca and sends my session id along with my request.
My request gets formally Intecepted by rogers' little notification system with my whole request for 'google.ca'
Rogers system now has my google.ca authentication cookie and could store it, or even make it available by some means of a security breach on their end to elite hackers who can then look at my exciting google mail.
That's as simple as I can put it. There are other more in depth issues with this - but that's that, and now I have to use a secured proxy from home too -- because my home is now an untrusted internet connection.
share:
interact: click here to read comments (five)
<< previous || current || random || next >>
prev . 1 . next
Claytanic Wrote...
Monday, April 7th 2008 at 1:24am
Find a good service in our area and I'll hook it up ! :P
mike Wrote...
Monday, April 7th 2008 at 1:32pm
Any ISP could do this already. Hell, any hop on the way to your destination could do this. (And who says they're not?) I've been treating any internet connection as insecure for a very long time now.
Use encryption wherever possible. Hell, I tunnel almost every piece of traffic from my computer through 24 (at least once other person will know what 24 is). Even if it continues on unencrypted past that site, my ISP has no idea where my traffic is heading. And I like it that way...
mike Wrote...
Monday, April 7th 2008 at 1:34pm
As a side note, I actually feel that the lack of full end to end encryption on the Internet is one of its largest pitfalls. I don't really give a crap if it means that QoS on the ISP level is harder, I want my traffic to be read only by the host it is intended for.
thunderchicken Wrote...
Monday, April 7th 2008 at 2:19pm
You have exciting Google mail too? How wonderful!
prev . 1 . next
5 Comments
You must be Logged in to leave comments.
SmrtySsa Wrote...
Monday, April 7th 2008 at 12:30am
Here's a sample screen cap: Image Browser - Funny images and more (rogers-notification-limit.png) . Pile of Crap ::